Two groups (A & B) assigned in class on Thursday 5/9.  Each group member is assigned a role and a schedule of deadlines is established by each group.

Final project is due on Wednesday June 12th; Progress reports due on Thursday May 23rd and Monday June 3rd.

After viewing the video in class, discuss the following questions with a partner.  Be sure to record at least brief responses to each question in your notebook as you discuss.  Refer to the Interview with Stephen Glass posted below for the final question.

 

1. What is the significance of the audience being told the median age of the reporters working for The New Republic? Is there something being said about the generation? The year is 1998, what “generation” does this movie pertain to, X or Y?

 

2. What do you think of the other Forbes reporter attempting to scoop or get her byline added to her co-workers story? Are her reasons altruistic? Are anyone’s reasons altruistic?

 

3. What does this movie say about society’s expectations from journalists? 

 

4. Whose point of view is the story being told from? Whose head are we in? What is the impact of that perspective?

 

5. The movie flashes back occasionally to the “lecture” Glass is giving his old classroom. We find out at movie’s end the lecture too is in Glass’s mind. Not knowing if this really happened with Glass or not, what does it say about the director’s viewpoint regarding Glass? Is this potentially fictional scene dishonest in and of itself?

 

6. What does this movie say about loyalty? Loyalty between peers and between people who have left the peer group like the protagonist did? Loyalty between employee and supervisor? How valid is Glass’ claim that the editor should do everything he can to back up his reporter? What does this belief say about Glass? Do you think it’s a prevalent opinion?

 

7. What do you make of the Forbes’ editor asserting that the magazine “must” run the story about Glass? 

 

8. Wesley Morris from the Boston Globe writes that the movie is “smart about portraying good vs. evil”—is the movie about a battle of good vs. evil? If so, who is good and who is evil?

 

9. If everything and everybody in Glass’ stories were made up, was what Glass did such a bad thing? Who did it hurt?

 

10. Can you think of similar instances of either academic dishonesty or plagiarism in the past few years? Do you know what Jayson Blair did? What James Frey did? Who Hwang Woo-suk is?

 

11. Discuss the issues of trust that were lost in the movie. How do you think his friends and peers felt after finding out about Glass? 

 

12. What penalties did Glass face? Do you think they were adequate?

 

13. Can you imagine ways in which the issues portrayed in the film relate to issues of academic integrity in college situations?

 

14. Read the “60 Minutes” interview with Stephen Glass transcript (posted on the class website). Do you believe Glass in the interview? Why or why not?